Gustakhi-e-rasool S.a.w.w

  • Work-from-home
Status
Not open for further replies.

MuftiSaeed

Regular Member
Dec 26, 2013
124
86
528
New York, New York
Sister @LaaraibLikhaari,

You are talking about Peer and your scholar,

You didnt even realize i am talking about Quran and Sunnah pure without any interference of any Peer of scholar or leader, By the way you have sakoon in this world by shaitan not from Allah. I provide PURE 100% evidence from Quran and Sunnah. Can ANYONE deny that? NO I didnt use the reference from any scholar go back and read and read ahmed raza khan was a EDITED in raza khan form not human and came to midguide ummah with his teachings. The propblem with paksitan and indians are they study books written by maulanas, and leaders and peers and imams,

GO TO QURAN, TAFSIR, SAHIH AHADITH BOOKS

Can ANYONE prove me wrong i provided teh true teachigns of Quran and Sunnah

jazakallah
 
Last edited by a moderator:

HorrorReturns

Banned
Mar 27, 2013
6,009
1,093
163
ham ne tehqeeq ki aur mazhabe ahl e sunnat aur maslak e Aalahazrat ko qubool kiya............aur aaj mere dil mein sukoon hai woh sukoon jo is se pehle kabhi na tha kyun ke woh wahi batate hain jo Huzoort صل اللہ الیہ و سلم ke zamaane aur sahaba e kiraam aur tabieen ke waqt se hai ...woh haq hain , haq hain aur haq hain................................
aaj bhi main tahqeeq karti hon aur jab bhi un ki books parhti hoon dalaael se qaail aur un ki muhabbat mein mazeed giriftaar hoti hoon..............
I love my Peer!
اپ کی کیسی تحقیق ہے عید میلاد کا ذکر نہ قرآن میں نہ حدیث بخاری میں پھر اپ نے لازمی منانی ہے -- غریب لوگوں کی چولوں اور پیاز والی رہریاں الٹا دیتے ہیں اپ کے عید میلاد والے جلوس
 

MuftiSaeed

Regular Member
Dec 26, 2013
124
86
528
New York, New York

LaaraibLikhaari

Senior Member
Dec 14, 2013
629
360
63
Mumbai Meri Jaan...........
Quote from so called mufti saeed:
ahmed raza khan was a shaitan in raza khan form not human and came to midguide ummah with his teachings. The propblem with paksitan and indians are they study books written by maulanas, and leaders and peers and imams,
@saviou dekheinmoderator saahab aap ke forum par hamare Imaam ko mubayyana shaitaan kaha ja raha hai ek iblees ke zariye...............
saeed nahi bad naseeb so called mufti......ab koi mujh se poochhne se pehle khud hi parh le agar yeh shakhs hamare Imaam ko shaitaan keh sakta hai to main bhi keh sakti hoon mere ssath ise bhi saza milni chahiye..........tabhi insaaf hoga................
@Abidi @Manxil
 

LaaraibLikhaari

Senior Member
Dec 14, 2013
629
360
63
Mumbai Meri Jaan...........

MuftiSaeed

Regular Member
Dec 26, 2013
124
86
528
New York, New York
ok here is my question

kya ye baatain theek hai Ahadees sey sabit hai ,,?mai ye kahin perha hai tou yaqeen krney sey pehley mai iski asal honey ka pochna chah rhi hon

View attachment 76307 View attachment 76308

@saviou
@HorrorReturns
@MuftiSaeed
Assalaam O Alaikum,

Praise Be To Allah

@Star24 we have avoid and should not belive books written by maulanas, molvi, scholars, leaders, anyone. The only books that we can trust only, that has direct reference from Quran and Sahih hadith, other than that the simple answer is DO NOT believe it. It is similar to the books of Tabligh Jamaat, Fadhail E Amal and Fadhail E Sadqat, they are corrupt books and should not be read by any Muslim other than scholar. Because they surely will corrupt your mind.

Everyone is correct as longas the information is from Quran and Hadith, other than that you should not trust, as Allah said to stick with the teachigns of Quran and Sunnah and stay and do not change your path and donot believe it.

In the first paragraph has the story of known peoplewe do not know, so we cannot trust that and should not accept it. unless it is quoted from Sahih hadith. Similar fabricated stories available in fatawa rizwia and fatwa of ashraf ali thanwi, both are fabricated sect of Islam non of them 100% correct. Have false stories fabricated stories total concepted by shaitan and corrupt the human mind towards walis. But when we say "Allah Hu Akbar" so thats the end, we should stick with true teachings ONLY and do not accept anyother's false fabricated stories.

Please note the authentic books you can trust only, even i author many books, you can check no other reference provided other than Quran and Hadith.

Quran
Tafsir ibn Kathir, Tabari, Qurtubi,
Bukhari,
Muslim,
Dawood,
Tirmighi,
Nasai,
Ibn Maajah,
Masnad Ahmed,

And still you have to learn to differentiate the classifications of the Ahadith to make sure the hadith is Sahih.

Other than these books. NEVER TRUST OR BELIEVE ANYONE.

In the article you send me there is no authentic reference provided, so throw in the garbage and do not pass to anyone and avoid spreading false.

Quran 49:6 Allah says, when you get any information, do not pass it on until you make sure it is true. Because if you spread teh false you get sin unknowingly, and you may regret later about this sin.

Shaitan came in the form of Ahmed Raza Khan and many more scholars to spread their teachings. The only scholar you can trust, that give the direct reference from the Quran and Sunnah. Other than that do not believe it. May shaitan whisper in your heart or mind to believe it, but DO NOT BELIEVE IT.

It is similar to many false fabricated siguesting thigns said by Ahmed Raza Khan, Please check below.

And Allah Knows Best

Abu Ammaar Saeed Ahmed
IRFNY.com

untitled13423.png
 

Humrahi

Active Member
Jun 18, 2012
291
243
743
!!India!!
Aap jaise log ki wajah se ISLAM ka naam kharaab hota hai aise kai daleelen mai aapko aapke maulvi maulanas ki desakta hu jo aapne Maulana Ahmed Raza Khana Sahab aur Tableeghi Jamaat ke talluq se kahi hai itna mawaad paraa hai mere paas agar lekar aane laga to sab saamne aayega lekin firqe ke khilaaf kehne ki ijazat nahi hai yaha kisi ko to aapko kisne haq diya aur jo image aapne share ki hai na to uske talluq se kehdun ke EXAMPLE agar aapko kisi se dushmani hai to aap us shaqs ke baare me bura hi kahenge aisa konsa insaan hai jo dushman ko acha kehta ho??

To aise bhi examples bohot saare hai Zakir naik, Tauseef ur rehman, meraj rabbani ke aur bohot se hai agar staff ijazat deden to yaha demarun sabke sab....

ALLAH knows best acha kehte ho khud dusron per ungli utha kar aur apne se saare faisle karke bohot khoob janaab.
 

LaaraibLikhaari

Senior Member
Dec 14, 2013
629
360
63
Mumbai Meri Jaan...........
dikha di na apni zehni zalalat so called mufti saahab? kaha gaye @saviou come n see aap ke rules ki mukhalifat ki jaa rahi hai abusive aur jo jo aap ne bataya sab ho raha hai yahan................:D
yeh ajeeb hai mere paas jo book hai maine us book mein yeh waqiyah parha hai wahaan to koi kaant chhant nahi lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
aur hua bhi to yeh kaun si Hadees hai jo gunaah mile janab?
Aalahazrat ko dekhte hue aap logo ne dekha tha?:D
woh ek waqiya bayaan kar rahe thy......kya aap ke paas itna bhi common sence nahi????????????:p
misaal ke taur par muftiyaan aurat ke haiz ka rang us ki aadat ke din sab ka bayaan karte hain to kya unhone khud yeh tajarba hasil kiya? hargiz nahi unhone yaqeenan apni aurton se suna aur yaad rakha to kya yeh kaha jaayega ke unhone haiz ko nikalte hue din raat dekha? hargiz nahi..................
think before you vomit
 

LaaraibLikhaari

Senior Member
Dec 14, 2013
629
360
63
Mumbai Meri Jaan...........
Aap jaise log ki wajah se ISLAM ka naam kharaab hota hai aise kai daleelen mai aapko aapke maulvi maulanas ki desakta hu jo aapne Maulana Ahmed Raza Khana Sahab aur Tableeghi Jamaat ke talluq se kahi hai itna mawaad paraa hai mere paas agar lekar aane laga to sab saamne aayega lekin firqe ke khilaaf kehne ki ijazat nahi hai yaha kisi ko to aapko kisne haq diya aur jo image aapne share ki hai na to uske talluq se kehdun ke EXAMPLE agar aapko kisi se dushmani hai to aap us shaqs ke baare me bura hi kahenge aisa konsa insaan hai jo dushman ko acha kehta ho??

To aise bhi examples bohot saare hai Zakir naik, Tauseef ur rehman, meraj rabbani ke aur bohot se hai agar staff ijazat deden to yaha demarun sabke sab....

ALLAH knows best acha kehte ho khud dusron per ungli utha kar aur apne se saare faisle karke bohot khoob janaab.
mere bhai staaf to is ki ijazat nahi dega ............
yeh ijazat sirf un ke aqaaed ke logo ke liye hain..........
so called zakir nalaik ke mureedo ke liye woh un ka peer hai na...............lolzzzzzzzzzzz
 

Humrahi

Active Member
Jun 18, 2012
291
243
743
!!India!!
mere bhai staaf to is ki ijazat nahi dega ............
yeh ijazat sirf un ke aqaaed ke logo ke liye hain..........
so called zakir nalaik ke mureedo ke liye woh un ka peer hai na...............lolzzzzzzzzzzz
yaha kehne se kuch nahi hoga kyun ke isi wajah se maine is forum per aana chod diya tha bohot din baad jab aaj login kara to phir yahi cheezen saamne hai, amal kuch nahi hota bus tanqeed me sabse aage hote hai.

Aur apko bata dun ye logon ne to Barelviyon ko ek naya firqa bana diya jo sunni bhi nahi hai .. pichle 2 sal pehle ke threads dekhenge to pata lagega aapko
 

MuftiSaeed

Regular Member
Dec 26, 2013
124
86
528
New York, New York
Assalaam O ALaikum,

Praise Be To Allah

Below history and arrogance wordings of the Ahmed Raza khan, socalled himself equal to ALlah, saying to his followers, anything i say should be accepted? This is clear words of Iblees who is telling his followers to accept anything i say.

A SIGN OF TRUE SCHOLAR.

The sign of the true scholar is, he will provide the teachings of Quran and Sunnah and will never provide his information.

If any scholar brings the teachings belong to so and so maulana, buzurg, imam, scholar, wali etc and brining stories about walis are shaitan in human face.

Shaitan was right, he said i will fool ignorants and they wont even realzie that they are in the hands of iblees.

-------------------------------------------------
Part 1

In British came to India, they brought forward some individuals to divide the Muslims and strengthen their rule. Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadyani and Ahmed Raza Khan Beralwi were among those individuals. Both gave fatwas that it is haram to fight the British. Anyone who was against the British rule, Ahmed Raza Khan & co made their takfeer. These individuals also supported the British in their fight against the Ottoman Empire. These people wrote books in support of Sharif of Makkah while he was revolting against the Ottomans. They opposed any movement that was set up for the benefit of Muslims. Ahmed Raza opposed Khilafat Movement which purpose was to save the Ottoman Empire. He also opposed Non-cooperation Movement.Ahmad Rida Khan from Bareilly, was born in the year 1856 and died in the year 1921 CE. His father's name was Naqi Ali Khan and his grandfather's name was Rida Ali KhanWhile in the Arab lands, Ahmed Zayni Dahlan was a British agent as mentioned by Dr. Allamah Khalid Mahmood in Mutaliya-e-Beralwiat. Ahmed Zayni Dahlan was also against the Ottomans and sided with Sharif of Makkah. British also took a fatwa from Ahmed Zayni Dahlan that India is Dar al-Islam and W. Hunter has quoted this fatwa in his book Our Indian Musalmaans." Since Ahmed Zayni Dahlan didnt have much influence on the masses of the sub-Continent, British looked to someone at home who could further their interests and who could have been a better candidate than Ahmed Raza Khan Beralwi.Ahmed Raza Khan had met Ahmed Zayni Dahlan in Makkah and from there it was decided that Ahmed Raza will work for the British goals in India while Ahmed Zayni Dahlan will do the same in the Arab lands. Dr. Allamah Khalid Mahmood mentions that in this meeting between the both, it was decided that Ahmed Raza Khan will compile a takfeeri document [Hasaam al-Haramain] against the akabir of Deoband and then through the help of Ahmed Zayni Dahlan, some Ulama were duped into signing this document. Mawlana Manzur Ahmad Naumani [r.h] has mentioned that Ahmed Zayni Dahlan made false accusations in his books. Even Egyptian scholar Rashid Rada mentions that Ahmed Zayni Dahlan used to propagate false rumors about anyone who was opposed his interests at the order of his masters.Ahmed Raza Khan writes in his Al-Mahajjat al-Mutamana p, 208:Jihad is not obligatory for us, the Muslims of India, on the basis of the Quran. He who holds that it is obligatory is an opponent to the Muslims and intends to harm them.Now let us analyze the history of Beralwi school of thought, its founder and how it stood against Dar-ul-Uloom Deoband in the eyes of un-biased historians.Famous British Francis Robinson , author of numerous books on the Muslims of South Asia, writes: The actions of one learned man, the very influential Ahmed Rada Khan, Bareilly, present our conclusion yet more clearly. He was the foremost supporter of unreformed Sufism in IndiaAt the same time he supported the colonial government loudly and vigorously, through out World War I, and the Khilafat MovementAdherence to local, custom-centered Islam, and opposition to Internationally conscious reformed Islam, seemed to go hand in hand with support for colonial rule. In his another book, Separatism Among Indian Muslims: The Politics of the United Provinces' Muslims, 1860-1923 (Paperback, 2007) Series: Cambridge South Asian Studies, Francis Robinson writes: It is not clear where the Berailly school had its strongholds but Mashriq of Gorakhpur and Al-Bashir usually took notice of pro-government fatwas of Ahmed Raza Khan, and it seems that schools permissive thinking on Islamic practice appealed especially to certain low status groups in Islamic society. The school adhered to corruption of Islam such as saint worship and intercession at tombs; these were common among converts, particularly in the rural areas, where often there were considerable similarities between Hindu and Muslim practices.On p422 on the same book, Robinson writes about Ahmed Raza Khan:Nevertheless his normal stand was of support for the government and he supported it throughout World War I, he opposed the Khilafat Movement, and in 1921 organized a conference of anti-non-cooperation Ulama at Bareily. He had considerable influence with the masses but was not favored by educated Muslims.From the above we know that Ahmed Raza was only popular among un-educated and ignorant. This was not the case with Deoband as it is clear from the quote provided below.Another famous British Historian Peter Hardi on p171 of The Muslims of British India paints a clear picture about different schools that were present at that time in the sub-Continent. He writes:The collection of fatawa by Deobandi Ulama are of immense importance for understanding the pre-occupation of the Indian Muslims. The Ulama of Deoband prided themselves on being Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jama, accepting the authority of the four orthodox Sunni mazahib, opposed to the Ahle Hadith, to the Ulama of Bariely schools, with their acceptance of intercession of saints and worship at the tombs and their ascription of semi divine qualities to the prophet, to the teaching of Sir Syed Khan Ahmed and the Ahmadiya. He continues:The prestige of Deoband as the active, confident and watchful guardian of the Sunni Islam was enhanced by its struggle against a new interpretation of Islam, which appeared in the late nineteenth century the Ahmadiya what engaged orthodox opinion was Mirza Ghulams Ahmed apparent challenge to the fundamental doctrine of KHATAM-E-NABUWWAT. And on p170, he writes:The most vital school of Ulama in India in the second half of the nineteenth century was centered upon Deoband, the Dar-ul-Uloom founded in 1867.In the same book on p272, he goes on to say:For every Alim [scholar] who issued a fatwa that India was Dar-ul-Harb, there would be one who declared that it was Dar-ul-Islam. Deoband represented the first response. Now what did he have to say about founder of Beralwi madhab? Ahmad Raza Khan of Bereily issued fatwa declaring India to be Dar-ul-Islam, making it a sin to associate with infidels [Hindus, against the British].Ahmed Raza Khan had found few individuals who carried onto his mission even after his death. Two of those individuals were Abdul Hamid Badawni and Abdul Majid Badawani. Ahmed Raza Khan has highly praised Abdul Majid Badawani and his brother. Now what did P. Hardi had to say about these two brothers? He writes on p272 on the same book:For their activates the brothers. Abdul Hamid and Abdul Majid were well rewarded by the government. Medals denotation the title of Shams-ul-Ulama dangled from their turbans, while for his anti-Khilafat work Abdul Majid was one of the most rewarded men in the province. At a provisional durbar in 1922, he received from the Harcourt Butler both a robe and a sword of honor.Sadly, Ahmed Raza Khan died in 1921 or he would have also been invited to his court and honored with valuable gifts. When members of Majlis Maeed al-Islam sent their envoy to meet the Viceroy in 1917, who was part of that mission? P. Hardi writes:Abdul Majid of Badaun, Wiliyat Hussain of Allahabad, Ahmed Raza Khan of Bariely and the two leading Shia Mujtahids of Lukhnow.The deputation was to include Shia Mujtahids as well as Wilayat Hussain of Allahabad and Ahmed Raza Khan of Bariely. The Deobandis characteristically objected to coming in with the Lukhnow lot.So from above it is clear that Beralwis supported the British along with Shias and Qadyanis. Lastly, let us look at the role of Deobandi scholars against the British occupiers and their efforts to save the Ottoman Empire. P. Hardi writes on p86-187:Despite Mestons complacency in 1915 some Muslims from among the Ulama did engage in fifth column work against the British during the war of 1914-18. A leading alim belong to Deoband Mahmud al-Hassan Shaykh al-Islam [1851-1920] left for the Hijaz in 1915 in order to contact Turks. After meeting with Enwar Pasha [1881-1922] and Jamal Pasha [1861-1922] he was detained by Shareef Hussains men when they rose in revolt against the Turks and handed over to the British who interred him in Malta between 1917-1920. One of his aids Mawlana Ubaidullah Sindi went to Afghanistan and worked with German and Turkish agents there to stir up the tribesmen against the British in the North Frontier.
 

MuftiSaeed

Regular Member
Dec 26, 2013
124
86
528
New York, New York
Part 2.

AN EXPOSITION OF THEIR BELIEFS, RITUALS, FITNA & LIES
The Barelvi's are a deviant sect founded by one Ahmad Rida Khan from Bareilly, India. Its founder was born in the year 1856 and died in the year 1921 CE. His father's name was Naqi Ali Khan and his grandfather's name was Rida Ali Khan (Tadhkira Ulama-e-Hind, vol.1, p. 1). The Barelvi, Ahmad Rida Khan was named as Amman Miyan by his mother while his father called him Ahmad Miyan. It was his grandfather who called him Ahmad Rida (see the book: Al-Bareilawi, p. 25 by Naseem al-Bastawi ). He liked none of these names and personally called himself Abdal Mustafa (see: Man huwa Ahmad Rida, by Shaja'at Ali al-Qadiri, p. 15). His most endeared followers used to call him: A'la Hadrat (His esteemed Highness)! They claim to be the only true Ahl-e-Sunnat wal Jamaat (Sunni) in the whole of the Indian subcontinent, and the representatives of the Hanafi Madhhab in jurisprudence (fiqh). In reality one can not fail to see the opposite on many occasions. This we hope to show with direct quotes and examples from their own works and how it is in direct contradistinction from the Madhhab they claim to follow.
AHAMD RIDA KHAN'S HARSHNESS:
The author of Hayat Ala hadrat (p. 211) known as: Zafar al-Din Bihari said: "He was hard hearted and callous to his opponents. He did not take any care required by the Sharia!"
The Barelvi was so harsh that even some of his followers left him. One of them was Muhammad Yasin, a founder and manager of a Madrasa called Isha'at al-Ulum. He separated himself from the Barelvi's after a while. Yasin's own father was involved with a Madrasa in Bareilly under the name of Misbah al-Tahdhib and he too severed himself away from the Barelvi's due to their callousness, insolence and declaring Muslim scholars as unbelievers - this is known as takfir (see Hayat ala hadrat, p. 211).
Let us provide some independent confirmation from a non-Deobandi and non-Barelvi source, but from an Orientalist who wrote a few pages on the Barelvi-Deobandi conflict. The author, Barbara Daly Metcalf who visited Deoband several times, as well as other seats of learning in India during the years 1969-1970 said in her book: Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860-1900 (p. 312):
"A number of attempts to found schools seem to have faltered (i.e. Barelvi one's). In 1872 Ahmad Riza's father founded a madrasah in Bareilly, the Misbahu't-Tahzib, but soon, with its name changed to the Misbahul-Ulum, it came under Deobandi control, supported by substantial traders and patronized by Maulana Muhammad Ahsan Nanawtawi. In 1894, another school was founded, the Isha'atul-Ulum, under the direction of Maulana Muhammad Yasin Panjabi, a former student at Deoband. In 1909, however, when Yasin attended the huge Deobandi convocation for former students, he began to drift away from belief in Ahmad Riza and back toward the Deobandi's."
We will come back to one significant point surrounding Maulana Yasin's defection from the Barelvi in 1909; it concerns the book Husam al-Haramain published by Ahmad Rida Khan in 1906.
AHMAD RIDA KHAN THE INFALLIBLE "PROPHET"!
They made him free from error and like the Ambiya (May Allah's peace and blessings be upon them all)! One of them said: "The pen of Ahmad Rida and his tongue were immune from a slip, even from a point, although it is an established fact that every scholar has a slip."
(See Abdal Hakim Sharaf's, Yadi Ala hadrat, p. 32).
Another Barelvi fanatic said: "The Barelvi did not utter even a word from his tongue repugnant to the Sharia. Allah has protected him from every
lapse!!" (Intro to Fatawa Ridwiyya, 2/5, by Muhammad Asghar).
Another individual by the name of Anwar Rida said in his book Majmuah maqalat al-Barelviya (p. 223): "Since his childhood Ahmad Rida has been
protected from straying and error, and adherence to the straight path was ingrained in his nature!!"
On page 271 he claimed further: "Allah protected his pen and tongue from error!" He went even further on p. 270 by saying: "Ala hadrat, the Barelvi, was in the hand of al-Ghawth al-Azam (Abdal Qadir al-Jilani) like a pen in the writers hand, and al-Ghawth al-Azam was in the hand of the Prophet (may peace and blessings be upon him) like a pen in the writer's hand, and the Prophet (may peace and blessings be upon him) does not speak of his own passion in the presence of Allah."
BARELVI'S LOVE FOR RIDA KHAN WAS MORE THAN THEIR LOVE FOR THE GREAT SAHABA!!
Hasnain Rida said in his book Wasaya al-Bareilawi (p. 24): "Our paying a visit to the Barelvi has lessened our eagerness to visit the Companions of the Prophet (sallallahu alaihi wa sallam)."
The esteemed author of the Fatawa Rahimiyah (available in English under 3 volumes), Mufti Abdur Rahim Qadri al-Lajpuri said (1/59, Q. no. 24) about the Barelvi sect: "They do not cherish as much reverence in their hearts for the Holy Companions as they do for the founder of the Reza Khani sect, Maulana Ahmed Reza Khan. It is stated in their book, the Wasaya Sharif: 'The state of his abstinence and piety was such that I heard some Shaykhs saying that on seeing him (Reza Khan) the eagerness for visiting the tombs of the great Companions was diminished in their hearts!' (God protect us from such thought!). Such is their veneration of the great Companions!"
We seek refuge in Allah from such crass beliefs. The real Sunni masses love all the Sahaba more than any scholar or Wali after them all. If one was to peruse through the Barelvi literature one can not fail to notice how they contradict not just the Madhhab they claim to follow in jurisprudence (fiqh) but also contradict the way of the Sahaba on a number of occasions. We hope to prove and elaborate on this later if Allah wills.
ONE OF HIS TEACHERS WAS THE QADIYANI'S OWN BROTHER!
The Barelvi was once a student of Mirza Ghulam Qadir Baig - the brother of the British agent and kafir, Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani (see Al-Bastawi's book: al-Bareilawi, p. 36).
HIS DISRESPECT IN USING THE NAME AND QUALITIES OF ALLAHU TA'ALA WHEN ATTACKING SOMEONE:
He attacked the Deobandi's by saying in nonsensical and unscholarly language: "A woman is capable of committing fornication. Then according to the opinion of your leader and teacher, it is necessary that your God too should be capable of committing fornication - otherwise the prostitutes of the brothers of the Deobandi's would laugh at Him and say: 'How do you claim for Godhead? You are not capable of doing which even we can do?' This naturally implies that your God must possess a female sexual organ - otherwise where will be the sexual intercourse?" (Subhan al-Subbuh. P. 142). May Allah save us from this sort of heinous and unscholarly language that is far from the ways of the rightly guided Sunni path, and its terminology in talking about Allahu ta'ala - even when attacking someone.
DECLARATION THAT THERE WAS NO JIHAD IN INDIA AGIANST THE BRITISH
Just like the Qadiyani unbelievers, the leader of this innovatory sect, Ahmad Rida Khan declared that in the time of British Imperialism in India, there was no Jihad against them! This led to his opponents to consider him to be a supporter of the British and some went to the level of accusing him to be funded by the British, just like the Qadiyani religion which emanated at the same time that Ahmad Rida Khan started his outbursts against all his major opponents from various parts of India.
Ahmad Rida Khan said in his al-Mahajjat al-Mu'tamana (p. 208): "Jihad is not obligatory for us, the Muslims of India, on the basis of the Qur'an. He who holds that it is obligatory is an opponent to the Muslims and intends to harm them!"
Look to these words and see how it contradicts the brave decision by thousands of Ulama who fought along with ordinary Muslims against the British and their treacherous servants in India, in the year 1857 CE. This is well known as the Mutiny of 1857 - and thousands of Ulama were slaughtered by the kuffar. See how Rida Khan is at variance with these martyrs of Islam.
He also said in his book: Dawam al-Aish (p. 46): "Jihad and fighting are not binding on the Muslims of India!"
In fact one of his followers who wrote the introduction to the last named book (p. 18) admitted that: "The Muslims harboured a bad faith about him."
Hasan Nizami in an article called Kitabi Dunya (p. 2) when referring to the introduction to Dawam al-Aish (p. 18) said about Ahmad Rida Khan: "Most of his novices and followers separated from him for their disagreement with him on the Khilafat Movement."
HIS EXAGGERATED LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT TO HIS FOLLOWERS
He exaggerated to the extent that he made a statement that his followers should strictly abide to his doctrines and ideologies, to the extent of that which we expect Prophet's to make to their own Nations! His statements have been collated by a Barelvi by the name of Hasnain Rida in a book entitled: Wasaya Sharif. Rida Khan said to his followers as recorded in the Wasaya (p. 10):
"Hold fast to my faith and doctrine which is apparent from my works. Hold fast to it and remain honest to it, for it is the most significant duty among the duties."
Does this not mean that following the views of the Barelvi are more important than the judgements deduced from the sources of Islamic Law by the Imams of the Hanafi Madhhab he claimed to belong to? A number of his views explicitly contradict the Hanafi Madhhab as we will show later if Allah wills. He expects his followers to make taqleed of him and his works!
He also said: "I do not know how long I shall live among you. You are the naive sheep of Mustafa (sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) and the wolves have encompassed you from all sides. They want to lead you astray and create schism and dissent among you. They wish to carry you to the hell-fire. So keep away from them, especially the Deobandi's!" (Al-Bastawi in his al-Bareilawi, p. 105).
HE ASKED ALL HIS FOLLOWERS TO EAT SUMTUOS DISHES AND DONATE THE REWARD TO HIS POOR SOUL AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE!
One of the most unusual and strange requests that he made to his followers is that he in direct opposition to the Prophet's (sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) Sunnah, and the method of all the Sahaba and the vast majority of the scholars of Ahl-al-Sunnah wa'l Jama'ah declared:
"After my death if possible present (sura) Fatiha to me twice or thrice in a week and offer the following dishes: ICED RICE PUDDING, EVEN IF IT IS MADE FROM THE MILK OF THE BUFFALO, BIRYANI RICE DISH OF THE BUKHARAN TYPE, KEBABS, KOFTA, TABAQ, CREAM, BEANS, SAMOSA, APPLE JUICE, POMEGRANATE JUICE, A BOTTLE OF WATER AND ICED MILK. IF IT IS POSSIBLE, YOU MAY PRESENT THIS OFFERING EVERYDAY, EVEN A DISH OF THEM - OTHERWISE AS YOU LIKE."
Just reading these words brings an emotion of laughter to the soul. They call this Isale-e-Sawab: Donating rewards to a deceased soul. But where in Islam does this strange and hilarious method emanate from? Great scholars have explained the Fiqh of Isale-e-Sawab and its correct methodology, but see how the Barelvi's exaggerate. What kind of Muslim would make such a last request? We have never heard any one from the early Muslim generations make such a dastardly request and also expect people to eat and spend on extravagant dishes - just for the soul of some individual! May Allah save us from extravagance and contradiction of the Shariah.
AHMAD RIDA KHAN'S SELF-PRAISING ARROGANCE AND HIS FOLLOWERS
Again he raised his rank to a great Prophet by saying about himself: "I am the monarch of the domain of speech. The people should accept whatever I say." (Quoted by Anwar Rida al-Barelvi in Hadaiqi Bakhshish, which is a collection of the Barelvi's poems, p. 319).
In his Sharh al-Huquq (p. 8) Rida Khan said about himself: "My breast is the bag of learning. Whenever I was asked about anything I replied to it immediately - be it concerned with any Science."
He said with respect to Shaykh Abdal Qadir al-Jilani: "I am the dog of Ghawth-i-Azam, and his necklace is in my neck." (Poem in Hadaiqi Bakshish)
He asked Shaykh Abdal Qadir for direct help in the following words: "O Helper, all the saints of the world go around the Noble House of Allah, but the Ka'ba itself goes around your exalted gate.." (Poem in Hadaiqi Bakhshish)
Hasnain Rida al-Barelvi went so far as to claim that: "No versatile scholar like him is found in the last two centuries!" (Wasaya al-Bareilawi, p. 24).
Ayyub Ali al-Barelvi said about Rida Khan with great exaggeration which some wouldn't hesitate to declare as Shirk the following in his Nafkhatal-Ruh (p. 5):
"He is the fulfiller of needs, remover of the calamities, obviator of difficulties, supplier of the water of Kawthar, the master of the grave, resurrection and congregation. He is the helper, the Pole of the Saints, the Successor of Mustafa (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam), the Khidr of the se of guidance, the donator and the sustainer." May Allah save us from their lies!
Another claimed in the introduction to the fourth volume of Fatawa Ridwiyya: "He was the Abu Hanifah of his time!"
By Allah, there were many great scholars in India and around the world who were far more superior in knowledge and etiquette's than the Barelvi. If we were to name just two from India who were within two centuries of Rida Khan it would be enough to see how these people exaggerate. First we may mention the name of Shah Waliullah al-Dehlawi (d. 1763 CE ) and secondly Shaykh Abdal Hayy al-Laknawi (d. 1304 AH), who was highly praised by non-Indian Hanafi scholars like Shaykh Muhammad Zahid al-Kawthari (d. 1371 AH ) and Shaykh Abdal Fattah Abu Ghuddah (d. 1997). These scholars were all far more knowledgeable than Ahmad Rida Khan.
CALLING ON OTHER THAN ALLAH FOR DIRECT HELP - AND HOW IT CONTRADICTS THE HANAFI MADHHAB
Ahmad Rida Khan said: "The order of the Helpers of the people (ghawth) and of those who are called for help begins from Ali, ending at al-Hasan al-Askari, the eleventh Imam of the Shia." (See the Malfuzat of the Barelvi).
He said in al-Amn wal-ala (p. 12-13): "Ali removes calamity and obliterates misery from him who recites the well known Saifi supplication, 7 or 3 times, or only once. This supplication is as follows: Call Ali for help who is the manifestation of wonders; you will find him a helper to you at the calamities. Every calamity and misery will be gone by your protection, O Ali, O Ali>>."
This is the same method that some of the most deviant groups like the Shia ask help from Hadrat Ali, radiallahu anhu - who is free from these lies attributed to him.
SALAT AL-GHAWTHIYYA:
One of the fanatical Barelvi's by the name of Ahmad Yar Khan described an innovatory Salat known to them as Salat al-Ghawthiyya in his book Ja'al Haqq (p. 200). This prayer was obviously unknown to Shaykh Abdal Qadir al-Jilani (its ascription to him can't be proven, like in the Ghunya, for this book has obvioulsy been tampered with). These people stop at nothing in their opposition to authentic methods of du'a. It is observed by first performing 2 rak'ahs of Salah and then the devotee stands in the direction of Baghdad and takes 11 steps towards it! As the Barelvi follower does so he has to recite the following supplication: "Can a wrong be done to me while you are my ammunition? Can I be oppressed in the world while you are my helper? Shame to the protector of the land while he is my helper, when the rope of my camels are lost in the desert."
Many Barelvi's follow the innovatory supplication made by Rida Khan in his Hadaiq Bakhshish. He used to say (p. 186): "O Shade of the deity of Shaykh Abdal Qadir, give me something for Allah's sake, Shaykh Abdal Qadir! Affection, affection, O affectionate Abdal Qadir. Remove from us the vicissitudes of time, O Abdal Qadir."
The Barelvi used to avoid asking Allahu ta'ala for help! He said in his Malfuzat (p. 307): "During my life I did not seek help from anyone, and I do not ask anyone for aid except Shaykh Abdal Qadir. Whenever I seek help, I seek it only from him. Whenever I ask for aid, I ask him alone. Once I tried to ask for aid and seek help from another saint (hadrat Mahbub Ilahi). When I intended to utter his name for seeking help, I did not utter the words but Ya Ghauthan (the one whose help is sought). My tongue refused to utter the words for seeking help from anyone except him!"
He continued his lies against Shaykh Abdal Qadir al-Jilani by saying in his Hadaiq Bakhshish (p. 26): "Shaykh Abdal Qadir has the power of disposition in the universe. He has been granted permission and he has the authority. He is the conductor of the affairs of the world."
He said further in the same book (pp. 125-126): "O Shade of Allah, Abdal Qadir. O place of refuge, Abdal Qadir. We are needy and indigent. You are the possessor of crown and integrity. Give me something for Allah's sake, Shaykh Abdal Qadir!"
On page 184 he lied further by saying: "The cushion of Abdal Qadir has been spread on the Throne, and the Throne has been brought down on earth!" On page 179 he claimed: "Shaykh Abdal Qadir is the helper who has the power of the word Kun fa yakun (Be and It is)."
A Barelvi by the name of Ayyub Ali said in his book: Bagh Firdaus (p. 26): "Shaykh Jilani is the helper of the helpers. He has the right of consolidation in the guarded tablet. He has the power of turning a woman into a man."
 

LaaraibLikhaari

Senior Member
Dec 14, 2013
629
360
63
Mumbai Meri Jaan...........
ohoo bad naseeb saahab! deen ka ilm nahi to kam az kam dunya ka hi saheeh ilm haasil kar le...........:D
history aap ki bari kamzor hai janab........agar yaha mods delete na karen to hamare paas bhi daleelein aur hidtory ki knowledge hai janab:D
 

zehar

VIP
Apr 29, 2012
26,600
16,301
1,313
aur baaqi ki images kaha hai 24 sahiba? ya woh bhi tassub ka shikaar haan?
aur bhi kucch images thi jo mazeed hawaalaa jaat rakhti thi yaqeenan................
mai ney us baat ki haqeeqat ka poocha hai hawala jaat likhey hai usk sath mai koi aalim e deen nhi hon mufti tou #muft sahib hai unko pta ho ga ye baat haqeqat hai ya nhi,,, ye aik book sey copy kiya hai mujhey nhi pta wo book kis ney likhi hai mazeed daikh kr pochongi
 
  • Like
Reactions: HorrorReturns
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top